As Americans question the physical and mental effects of aging on President Biden, political experts and fans of former VP candidate Senator Dean Phillips are wondering if it’s time for a younger leader. Following Biden’s recent election, Phillips, 80, has publicly challenged the President’s leadership and posed to question if having an octogenarian leader is the best choice for America.
Although Phillips likely doesn’t see himself as Biden’s replacement, his age has caused many Democrats to seriously consider whether ageism should be a factor in selecting their party’s leader. Phillips has cited his upcoming birthday, 81, as the reason he chose not to run for President. He also mentioned his physical struggles due to his advanced age, noting that fatigue and chronic illnesses have kept him from truly mounting a successful campaign.
Whether intentional or unintentional, Phillips’ commentary has shined much needed attention on ageism in the workplace and its potential effects on leadership. While ageism, especially when used as an excuse to prevent someone from advancing, is often overlooked, it can harm progress if those in power deny their own physical shortcomings or the effects of aging.
In Biden’s case, rancor over his age may be partly due to his having to take over his predecessor’s mantle at a time of extreme opposition in the U.S. While some believe that Biden’s years of political experience will carry him through, others fear that his physical and mental capabilities may be hampered by his advanced age.
Ultimately, it is evident that while ageism is something to be avoided in the job market, it is reasonable for Americans to be concerned about the physical and mental fatigue that can come with age. In the coming years it may become an even more pressing issue if word of Phillips’ challenge to Biden continues to spread. It may be time for the Democrats to seriously consider whether or not having an octogenarian leader is the best move for the nation.