When Donald Trump’s fraud trial begins in New York on Tuesday, his lawyers are expected to mount a vigorous defense, countered by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The fraud trial will be the first time Trump has faced a criminal prosecution since he became president.
Trump is accused of using his foundation to benefit his businesses and political campaign, as well as personally enriching himself. These allegations of fraud have been under investigation since at least 2018. Although the criminal trial is likely to be the centerpiece of the case, there are a number of other issues that Trump’s lawyers may also argue.
First, Trump’s defense team is likely to challenge the state’s standing to bring the case. They may argue that the Attorney General does not have the legal authority to initiate a criminal case against Trump. If successful, this argument could weaken the case against Trump.
Second, Trump’s lawyers may argue that the alleged violations are not illegal under New York state laws. They might claim that the actions taken by Trump, such as the use of charitable funds to benefit himself, were commonplace practices in business. As such, they should not be prosecuted as criminal offenses.
Third, Trump’s legal team is likely to argue that the investigation was tainted by political motivations. They may argue that the Attorney General was looking to make an example of Trump, rather than simply seek justice. This could be used to discredit the case against Trump.
Finally, Trump’s lawyers can also point out that some of the alleged violations occurred before Trump became president. This could be used to contest the state’s jurisdiction to pursue a criminal case against Trump.
Overall, Trump’s lawyers are expected to use a variety of legal arguments to contest the Attorney General’s case and try to exonerate their client. Whether or not these arguments will be successful remains to be seen. The trial is set to begin in New York on Tuesday.